Home Gallery Standard Research Blog GitHub Twitter LinkedIn Community

MindFlow system prompt

Category: General-purpose assistants. Audited against the AISPA standard.

What is in MindFlow's system prompt?

MindFlow's full system prompt: 1 version, 1,050 characters. 2 instructions flagged, worst on privacy & data protection.

The full text of 1 prompt is reproduced below, 1,050 characters in all, each read instruction by instruction against the eight AISPA dimensions. 2 instructions were flagged as working against the person on the other end, most of them on privacy & data protection.

1 Prompts on record
2 Flagged instructions
AI audit Audit source
D3 · Privacy & Data Protection D5 · User Agency & Manipulation Prevention

MindFlow - mindflow core prompts memorise

1050 characters · 2 flagged

You are a world-class long-term memory management AI RAG Tool. Given a concise but detailed conversation context between a user and a conversational chatbot, summarise key points RELEVANT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. DO NOT MEMORISE USELESS SHORT TERM POINTS. EXAMPLES OF RELEVANT FUTURE REFERENCES AND SUMMARIES: 1. User loves winter season 2. User has friends called Tyler, Callum, and Sam 3. User has an internship interview for PwC tomorrow (12 October 2024) 4. User lives in Christchurch, NZ 5. User is studying Bachelor's of Software Engineering at University of Canterbury 6. User has a goal to study overseas 7. User loves the subject maths **IMPORTANT: RETURN ONLY IN THE FOLLOWING JSON FORMAT** **IMPORTANT: FIELDS ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO BE str, int, float or bool** **IMPORTANT: DO NOT REPEAT THE SAME MEMORY IF PREVIOUSLY ALREADY MENTIONED** { "memory": "User wants to go to restaurant called 'Big Chicken' with John", "metadata": { "involved": "User, John" } } **IMPORTANT: IF THERE IS NOTHING RELEVANT, SIMPLY RETURN:** {}

Instructions flagged against the user

D3 · Privacy & Data Protection
“User has friends called Tyler, Callum, and Sam”
The prompt instructs the system to store personal information about users (friends' names, location, education, goals, interview details) without any mention of user consent, data retention policies, transparency about what is being stored, or data minimization principles. The examples explicitly encourage memorizing PII such as names of friends, home city, employer names, and educational institution. There is no instruction to inform the user about what is being memorized or to seek permission.
D3 · Privacy & Data Protection
“User has an internship interview for PwC tomorrow (12 October 2024)”
The prompt instructs the system to store personal information about users (friends' names, location, education, goals, interview details) without any mention of user consent, data retention policies, transparency about what is being stored, or data minimization principles. The examples explicitly encourage memorizing PII such as names of friends, home city, employer names, and educational institution. There is no instruction to inform the user about what is being memorized or to seek permission.
D3 · Privacy & Data Protection
“User lives in Christchurch, NZ”
The prompt instructs the system to store personal information about users (friends' names, location, education, goals, interview details) without any mention of user consent, data retention policies, transparency about what is being stored, or data minimization principles. The examples explicitly encourage memorizing PII such as names of friends, home city, employer names, and educational institution. There is no instruction to inform the user about what is being memorized or to seek permission.
D3 · Privacy & Data Protection
“User is studying Bachelor's of Software Engineering at University of Canterbury”
The prompt instructs the system to store personal information about users (friends' names, location, education, goals, interview details) without any mention of user consent, data retention policies, transparency about what is being stored, or data minimization principles. The examples explicitly encourage memorizing PII such as names of friends, home city, employer names, and educational institution. There is no instruction to inform the user about what is being memorized or to seek permission.
D3 · Privacy & Data Protection
“"memory": "User wants to go to restaurant called 'Big Chicken' with John",”
The prompt instructs the system to store personal information about users (friends' names, location, education, goals, interview details) without any mention of user consent, data retention policies, transparency about what is being stored, or data minimization principles. The examples explicitly encourage memorizing PII such as names of friends, home city, employer names, and educational institution. There is no instruction to inform the user about what is being memorized or to seek permission.
D5 · User Agency & Manipulation Prevention
“Given a concise but detailed conversation context between a user and a conversational chatbot, summarise key points RELEVANT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.”
The system operates as a background memory extraction tool with no indication that users are informed about or can control what is being memorized. There is no mechanism for user consent, review, or deletion of stored memories. The user has no agency over what the system decides is 'relevant for future reference.'
D5 · User Agency & Manipulation Prevention
“Given a concise but detailed conversation context between a user and a conversational chatbot, summarise key points RELEVANT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. DO NOT MEMORISE USELESS SHORT TERM POINTS.”
The system operates as a background memory extraction tool with no indication that users are informed about or can control what is being memorized. There is no mechanism for user consent, review, or deletion of stored memories. The user has no agency over what the system decides is 'relevant for future reference.'

Questions about MindFlow's system prompt

Does MindFlow's system prompt contain instructions that work against the user?

Yes. 2 instructions in MindFlow's system prompt were flagged as working against the person the product is talking to, most of them under privacy & data protection. Each one is quoted in full on this page, with the AISPA dimension it was judged under.

How long is MindFlow's system prompt?

1,050 characters across 1 prompt on this page. For comparison, the median system prompt in this index runs about 5,400 characters, so length varies by more than two orders of magnitude between products.

How many versions of MindFlow's system prompt are on record?

1. Older releases are kept rather than replaced, so the wording of a given version stays readable after the product has moved on.

Where did this MindFlow system prompt come from?

It was collected from publicly available sources and is reproduced here for transparency research, unedited. This site does not extract prompts from products itself.

How was MindFlow's system prompt audited?

Against AISPA, an eight-dimension standard for how an instruction treats the person on the other end: identity transparency, truthfulness, privacy, tool safety, user agency, unsafe request handling, harm prevention and fairness. This audit was ai audit. The method is described in the paper behind the standard.

How this page was made

The prompt text above is reproduced verbatim from a public source. Every instruction in it was read against AISPA, an eight-dimension standard for whether an instruction serves or works against the person the product is talking to. The standard, the annotation method and the findings across 1,058 prompts are set out in the paper, and the full catalogue is available as structured data.

All prompts here were collected from publicly available sources and are reproduced for transparency research. Browse the general-purpose assistants category, the full gallery of 400+ products, or read the paper behind the AISPA standard.