What is in learn-low-code-agentic-ai's system prompt?
learn-low-code-agentic-ai's full system prompt: 1 version, 4,636 characters. Audited against AISPA.
The full text of 1
prompt is reproduced below,
4,636 characters in all, each read
instruction by instruction against the eight
AISPA dimensions.
Nothing was flagged as working against the person on
the other end.
4636 characters
# Multi-Agent Tool Project
Here’s a tiny, single-canvas project you can build in n8n to get a **Primary Agent** that delegates to two **AI Agent Tool** sub-agents: **Researcher** and **Summarizer**.
# Layout (one canvas)
```
Manual Trigger
└─> Primary Agent (AI Agent)
├─(Tools input)─ Researcher (AI Agent Tool)
└─(Tools input)─ Summarizer (AI Agent Tool)
```
# Nodes & wiring (quick steps)
1. **Manual Trigger**
* No config—just to start executions and pass a test question via the Primary Agent’s “User message”.
2. **Primary Agent (AI Agent)**
* **Model:** connect your preferred chat model node (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, etc.).
* **System prompt (example):**
```
You are the Orchestrator. Decide whether to call tools.
If the question needs web info, call the “researcher” tool with a focused query.
After results arrive, call the “summarizer” tool to distill to 5 bullets.
If no research is needed, answer directly.
```
* **User message:** e.g., map from the Trigger or set a fixed test prompt:
```
“Find 3 recent sources on ‘serverless vs Kubernetes for small teams’ and summarize the tradeoffs.”
```
* **Max steps:** 8 (prevents runaway loops).
* **Return tool calls / intermediate steps:** ON (helps debugging).
3. **Researcher (AI Agent Tool)**
* **Tool name:** `researcher`
* **Tool description:**
```
Searches the web for the given topic and returns a concise, source-backed brief:
- 3–5 links with titles
- 3–5 sentence summary
- Any recent dates mentioned
```
* **Inside the tool (on the same canvas):**
* Add whatever you use for search/fetch (e.g., **HTTP Request** to your search API, or your preferred “search” node).
* (Optional) Add a small **AI Model** node to clean/condense fetched snippets.
* **Tool Output:** a single text blob with short bullet summary + list of sources (title + URL).
* **Input schema (simple):** one string field `query`.
4. **Summarizer (AI Agent Tool)**
* **Tool name:** `summarizer`
* **Tool description:**
```
Takes raw notes/snippets and produces a five-bullet executive summary plus a one-line bottom line.
```
* **Inside the tool:**
* Add an **AI Model** node and prompt it to:
```
Summarize this content into 5 crisp bullets. End with “Bottom line:” + one sentence.
Keep vendor-neutral tone. Include dates if present.
```
* **Tool Output:** summary text.
* **Input schema:** one string field `content`.
5. **Wire the tools into the Primary Agent**
* Connect the **Tool output** of **Researcher** to the **Tools** input of **Primary Agent**.
* Connect the **Tool output** of **Summarizer** to the **Tools** input of **Primary Agent**.
* Connect your **Model** node(s) to the respective agent/tool nodes as required by your credential setup.
6. **Test**
* Hit **Execute** on Manual Trigger.
* In the Primary Agent execution, you should see it call `researcher(query=...)`, receive results, then call `summarizer(content=...)`, and finally return a clean answer.
---
## Example prompts you can paste
### Primary Agent — System
```
You are “Orchestrator”, an AI that delegates.
Policy:
1) If the user’s question requires fresh or external info, call the tool “researcher” with a narrowly scoped query string.
2) After researcher returns, call “summarizer” with the researcher’s content.
3) If no external info is needed, answer directly in ≤8 sentences.
Always return a final, user-ready answer.
```
### Researcher — Tool inner prompt (if you add an AI cleanup step)
```
You clean and condense web snippets.
Return:
- 3–5 concise bullets with key facts and dates
- Then a “Sources:” list of title + URL per line
Avoid speculation. If info conflicts, say so.
```
### Summarizer — Tool inner prompt
```
Summarize into 5 crisp bullets.
End with: “Bottom line: …”
Keep it neutral, concrete, and date-aware.
```
---
## Tips & gotchas
* **Schemas help the Agent plan.** Give each AI Agent Tool a tiny input schema (e.g., `{ "type":"object","properties":{"query":{"type":"string"}},"required":["query"] }`), so the Primary Agent knows what arguments to pass.
* **Debug quickly.** Turn on intermediate steps in the Primary Agent to see each tool call and payload.
* **Guardrails.** Cap “Max steps” and “Max tool calls per step” to avoid loops.
* **Nest layers.** You can add a third tool later (e.g., `fact_checker`) or even nest an AI Agent Tool inside `researcher` for “fetch → extract → dedupe” as a mini-pipeline—still on the same canvas.
Questions about learn-low-code-agentic-ai's system prompt
Does learn-low-code-agentic-ai's system prompt contain instructions that work against the user?
No. Nothing in learn-low-code-agentic-ai's system prompt was flagged as working against the person the product is talking to. That is a clean result across all eight AISPA dimensions, not an absence of checking — the full text was read instruction by instruction.
How long is learn-low-code-agentic-ai's system prompt?
4,636 characters across 1 prompt on this page. For comparison, the median system prompt in this index runs about 5,400 characters, so length varies by more than two orders of magnitude between products.
How many versions of learn-low-code-agentic-ai's system prompt are on record?
1. Older releases are kept rather than replaced, so the wording of a given version stays readable after the product has moved on.
Where did this learn-low-code-agentic-ai system prompt come from?
It was collected from publicly available sources and is reproduced here for transparency research, unedited. This site does not extract prompts from products itself.
How was learn-low-code-agentic-ai's system prompt audited?
Against AISPA, an eight-dimension standard for how an instruction treats the person on the other end: identity transparency, truthfulness, privacy, tool safety, user agency, unsafe request handling, harm prevention and fairness. This audit was ai audit. The method is described in the paper behind the standard.