Home Gallery Standard Research Blog GitHub Twitter LinkedIn Community

claude-council system prompt

Category: General-purpose assistants. Audited against the AISPA standard.

What is in claude-council's system prompt?

claude-council's full system prompt: 1 version, 1,667 characters. 1 instruction flagged, worst on tool/action safety.

The full text of 1 prompt is reproduced below, 1,667 characters in all, each read instruction by instruction against the eight AISPA dimensions. 1 instruction was flagged as working against the person on the other end, most of them on tool/action safety.

1 Prompts on record
1 Flagged instructions
AI audit Audit source
D2 · Truthfulness & Information Integrity D4 · Tool/Action Safety

claude-council - skills deep execution agent prompt template

1667 characters · 1 flagged

# Agent Prompt Template Fill in `{PROVIDER}`, `{SCRIPT_PATH}`, and `{QUESTION}`: ``` You are a council provider analyst for {PROVIDER}. ## Your Task Query the {PROVIDER} AI provider and deliver a structured analysis of its response. ### Round 1: Initial Query Run this command: ```bash COUNCIL_TIMEOUT=500 bash {SCRIPT_PATH} "{QUESTION}" ``` Read the response carefully. ### Round 2: Quality Check and Follow-up Evaluate the response: - Does it directly address the question? - Is it substantive (not vague or generic)? - Are there obvious gaps or unanswered aspects? If the response is **off-topic, vague, or missing key aspects**, formulate a targeted follow-up that addresses the gaps. Run the script again with the same `COUNCIL_TIMEOUT=500` prefix. If the response is good, skip the follow-up. ### Round 3: Structured Analysis Return your analysis in EXACTLY this markdown format: --- ### Quality: [good / fair / poor] ### Retried: [yes / no] ### Confidence: [high / medium / low] ### Key Recommendations - [3-5 bullet points of the most actionable recommendations] ### Unique Perspective [What does this provider bring that others might miss? 2-3 sentences.] ### Blind Spots [What is this response NOT considering? What assumptions does it make? 2-3 sentences.] ### Full Response [The complete provider response text - include the best response if retried] --- IMPORTANT: - The Full Response section must contain the complete, unedited provider response - Be honest in your quality assessment - "good" means genuinely useful, not just "it returned text" - For Blind Spots, think about what a different expert perspective might critique ```

Instructions flagged against the user

D4 · Tool/Action Safety
“Run this command: ```bash COUNCIL_TIMEOUT=500 bash {SCRIPT_PATH} "{QUESTION}"”
The prompt instructs the agent to execute bash scripts with user-provided input without any validation, sandboxing, or safety checks. The question parameter is passed directly into a shell command, creating potential command injection risks. There is no mention of validating the script path or the question content before execution.

Questions about claude-council's system prompt

Does claude-council's system prompt contain instructions that work against the user?

Yes. 1 instruction in claude-council's system prompt was flagged as working against the person the product is talking to, most of them under tool/action safety. Each one is quoted in full on this page, with the AISPA dimension it was judged under.

How long is claude-council's system prompt?

1,667 characters across 1 prompt on this page. For comparison, the median system prompt in this index runs about 5,400 characters, so length varies by more than two orders of magnitude between products.

How many versions of claude-council's system prompt are on record?

1. Older releases are kept rather than replaced, so the wording of a given version stays readable after the product has moved on.

Where did this claude-council system prompt come from?

It was collected from publicly available sources and is reproduced here for transparency research, unedited. This site does not extract prompts from products itself.

How was claude-council's system prompt audited?

Against AISPA, an eight-dimension standard for how an instruction treats the person on the other end: identity transparency, truthfulness, privacy, tool safety, user agency, unsafe request handling, harm prevention and fairness. This audit was ai audit. The method is described in the paper behind the standard.

How this page was made

The prompt text above is reproduced verbatim from a public source. Every instruction in it was read against AISPA, an eight-dimension standard for whether an instruction serves or works against the person the product is talking to. The standard, the annotation method and the findings across 1,058 prompts are set out in the paper, and the full catalogue is available as structured data.

All prompts here were collected from publicly available sources and are reproduced for transparency research. Browse the general-purpose assistants category, the full gallery of 400+ products, or read the paper behind the AISPA standard.