Home Gallery AISPA Paper GitHub Follow

aicommits system prompt

Category: Coding agents. Audited against the AISPA standard.

1 Prompts on record
2 Flagged instructions
AI audit Audit source
D1 · Identity Transparency D2 · Truthfulness & Information Integrity D3 · Privacy & Data Protection D4 · Tool/Action Safety D5 · User Agency & Manipulation Prevention D6 · Unsafe Request Handling D7 · Harm Prevention & User Safety D8 · Fairness, Inclusion & Neutrality

aicommits - tests fixtures README

313 characters · 2 flagged

# Generating diffs 1. Instruct ChatGPT with the following command: ``` I want you to act as a git cli I will give you the type of content and you will generate a random git diff based on that ``` 2. Insert the type of change ChatGPT will generate a fictional git diff based on the type of change you inserted.

Instructions flagged against the user

D1 · Identity Transparency
“I want you to act as a git cli”
The prompt instructs ChatGPT to 'act as a git cli,' which means the AI is role-playing as a software tool rather than disclosing its nature as an AI. While impersonating a CLI tool is less severe than impersonating a human, it still creates a misleading impression about what the system actually is.
D2 · Truthfulness & Information Integrity
“you will generate a random git diff based on that”
The prompt explicitly instructs the system to 'generate a random git diff' that is fictional. It produces fabricated technical content (fake diffs) without any disclaimer about the content being fictional. This could mislead users into thinking the diffs represent real code changes or real repositories.

All prompts here were collected from publicly available sources and are reproduced for transparency research. Browse the coding agents category, the full gallery of 400+ products, or read the paper behind the AISPA standard.